Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kiranpal Pannu vs Roberto Cid Subervi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pannu vs Subervi analysis and find out who is favored!
Kiranpal Pannu vs Roberto Cid Subervi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Pannu 1 - 0 Subervi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pannu has won 44.84% of points on his second serve, while Subervi has won 50.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pannu, in recent form, has won 52.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Subervi has won 56.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.22% and 36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pannu has saved 51.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Subervi has saved 50.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pannu has won 58.93% of matches played (W/L 33/ 23), with Subervi winning 65.15% (W/L 43/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pannu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 74/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Subervi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 120/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Pannu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 19/ 10), where as Subervi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.47% of matches (W/L 36/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pannu winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pannu winning 2 and Subervi winning 1. The last match between Pannu and Subervi was at the M25 Santo Domingo, 07-03-2024, Second, Hard with Kiranpal Pannu getting the victory 4-6 7-6(5) 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pannu and Subervi have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pannu winning 1 times and Subervi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Pannu winning 1, and Subervi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pannu has played against opponents with an average rank of 193.96 while Subervi has played against players with an average rank of 208.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pannu has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Subervi has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pannu has converted 55.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Subervi has converted 46.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
559
Rank
559
High
27
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
415
Rank
211
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
58% (114-82)
Career Total W/L
57% (279-209)
63% (19-11)
YTD W/L
65% (22-12)
$14,725
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kiranpal Pannu | Roberto Cid Subervi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:17:0 | 3:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (58/96) | 69% (73/106) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (36/58) | 58% (42/73) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (18/38) | 42% (14/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (50/106) | 44% (42/96) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(5) 6-0 |
Stats 
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
50 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kiranpal Pannu | Roberto Cid Subervi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (19/11) | 65% (22/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (38/29) | 59% (46/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (311/279) | 55% (390/319) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 70% (14/6) | 71% (10/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 63% (12/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 89 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:41 | 1:54:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 206.37 | 269.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1183/1891) | 68% (1509/2204) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (767/1183) | 67% (1004/1509) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (316/708) | 50% (348/695) |
| BPs Won% Total | 56% (105/186) | 46% (126/272) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (780/1784) | 44% (1004/2295) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 70% (16/7) | 75% (15/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (17/27) | 65% (22/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (6/6) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 80% (8/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (14/13) | 95% (20/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (14/1) | 5% (20/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 21% (14/3) |
Kiranpal Pannu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Leo Borg
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Aryan Shah
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Matt Kuhar
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
9
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Daniel Azar
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Aryan Shah
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Ryan Fishback
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
29 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Aristotelis Thanos
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Daniel Vishnick
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Osgar O'Hoisin
57%
(
64 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
7
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
42%
(
47 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
47 of
64)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
64)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Christopher Bulus
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
4
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
66 of
131)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
45 of
131)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Hady Habib
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Roncadelli
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
91%
(
60 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
14
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pannu Vs Subervi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
